Media ranking

goal.com

PRELIMINARY

1 analysis · As of 22 July 2026 · v2.3

Analyse an article from this outlet

How is goal.com rated?

KI-Mentor does not yet publish a rating for goal.com. The assessment so far rests on 1 analysed article since 22 July 2026; a grade is published from 10 analyses onward — 9 still missing. Until then this page shows the detected patterns but no overall grade.

AI-generated analysis. Rating and reasoning are produced automatically and are not individually reviewed by an editor.

View the full methodology

Composite

Technique density

97

Trend (7d)

Trend (30d)

Not rated — too few analyses for a dependable rating1 of 10 analyses — a grade is published from 10 onward.

How has the rating of goal.com developed?

Rating history
As ofScoreGradeAnalyses
29 July 20263.01
5 August 20263.01
12 August 20263.01
19 August 20263.01
26 August 20263.01
2 September 20263.01
3 September 20263.01

What is the rating of goal.com based on?

13 detected findings across 1 analysed articles, grouped by the six analysis steps of the methodology.

Advanced Rhetoric

5 · in 1 of 1 articles

Complex metaphors, implicit biases, and dog whistles

high 1 · medium 3 · low 1

Core Manipulation Techniques

4 · in 1 of 1 articles

Emotional appeals, authority arguments, urgency, loaded language, and false dilemmas

high 1 · medium 2 · low 1

Statistics & Framing

4 · in 1 of 1 articles

Manipulation through numbers, selective presentation, and strategic framing

high 2 · medium 2 · low 0

Most frequent individual techniques

  • Autoritätsargumente1/1 articles
  • Cherry Picking1/1 articles
  • Dog Whistles1/1 articles
  • Emotionale Appelle1/1 articles
  • Falsche Äquivalenz1/1 articles
  • Falsche Dilemmas1/1 articles
  • Framing1/1 articles
  • Gaslighting1/1 articles

For copyright reasons no excerpts from the analysed articles are reproduced here — only the detected patterns and how often they occur. Each original article is linked.

Dispute this rating

If you represent goal.com or see an error in this rating: a short message is enough, no justification is required. Every report is reviewed within 7 days and the outcome is recorded.

Which goal.com articles were analysed?

ScoreArticleDate
97
Horrorzahlen! Leroy Sane enttäuscht erneut bei WM-Aus von Deutschland - auch Deniz Undav liefert erschreckende Statistik | Goal.com Deutschland
Jul 22