Media ranking

derstandard.at

PRELIMINARY

2 analyses · As of 8 September 2026 · v2.3

Analyse an article from this outlet

How is derstandard.at rated?

KI-Mentor does not yet publish a rating for derstandard.at. The assessment so far rests on 2 analysed articles since 8 September 2026; a grade is published from 10 analyses onward — 8 still missing. Until then this page shows the detected patterns but no overall grade.

AI-generated analysis. Rating and reasoning are produced automatically and are not individually reviewed by an editor.

View the full methodology

Composite

—

Technique density

30

Trend (7d)

—

Trend (30d)

—

Not rated — too few analyses for a dependable rating — 2 of 10 analyses — a grade is published from 10 onward.

How has the rating of derstandard.at developed?

Rating history
As ofScoreGradeAnalyses
15 September 202670.0—2
22 September 202670.0—2
29 September 202670.0—2
6 October 202670.0—2
13 October 202670.0—2
19 October 202670.0—2

What is the rating of derstandard.at based on?

10 detected findings across 2 analysed articles, grouped by the six analysis steps of the methodology.

Core Manipulation Techniques

6 · in 2 of 2 articles

Emotional appeals, authority arguments, urgency, loaded language, and false dilemmas

high 0 · medium 3 · low 3

Advanced Rhetoric

2 · in 1 of 2 articles

Complex metaphors, implicit biases, and dog whistles

high 0 · medium 0 · low 2

Logical Fallacies

1 · in 1 of 2 articles

Ad Hominem, strawman arguments, slippery slope, and other logical fallacies

high 0 · medium 0 · low 1

Narratives & Stories

1 · in 1 of 2 articles

Personal anecdotes, emotional stories, and narrative persuasion

high 0 · medium 0 · low 1

Most frequent individual techniques

  • Falsche Dilemmas2/2 articles
  • Geladene Sprache2/2 articles
  • Angst/Dringlichkeit1/2 articles
  • Autoritätsargumente1/2 articles
  • Falsche Kausalität1/2 articles
  • Implizite Vorurteile1/2 articles
  • Komplexe Metaphern1/2 articles
  • Narrative Verzerrung1/2 articles

For copyright reasons no excerpts from the analysed articles are reproduced here — only the detected patterns and how often they occur. Each original article is linked.

Dispute this rating

If you represent derstandard.at or see an error in this rating: a short message is enough, no justification is required. Every report is reviewed within 7 days and the outcome is recorded.

Which derstandard.at articles were analysed?

ScoreArticleDate
43
Pisa: Schülerinnen und Schüler lesen immer schlechter - Bildung - derStandard.at › Inland
Sep 8
10
derStandard.at
Sep 8